The readers’ survey conducted last autumn allowed readers of
Rotor Journal to express their opinions on the publication’s new
format and to make suggestions for improvements. Here are some
of the major points.
Rotor Journal is the preferred reading material for the
majority of Eurocopter customers. It turns out that the
magazine, published at two-monthly intervals in four languages,
has an extremely faithful readership, given that
90.49% of those who completed the questionnaire
stated that they always read the magazine as soon as
they received it. The question concerning reading habits
reveals a genuine interest on the part of the readers, of
whom 61.64% said that they read Rotor Journal from
cover to cover and 38.36% said that they at least looked
at parts of it. Evidently regarded as a reliable source of
information (91.41% of replies ticked the boxes “completely
agree” or “mostly agree”), the magazine would
appear to be essential reading, eagerly awaited and
appreciated by its readers.
The new format received a majority of votes in its favour,
with 93.84% of readers stating that they found its layout
better, and 89.73% agreeing that it was easier to read.
By dedicating sufficient room to articles about customers
and operators (an opinion shared by 85.2% of
Rotor Journal readers) and setting aside plenty of space
for photos, Rotor Journal seems to have achieved its
objective of serving as an interface that cultivates a
feeling of trust between Eurocopter and its customers.
A few suggested improvements
30.13% of the people who sent in replies to the survey
made suggestions for improvements, demonstrating
their willingness to make an active contribution to
improving the quality of their magazine. Obviously very
attentive to the content of Rotor Journal, readers would
like to see greater emphasis on topics related to
research and development, the activities of competitors,
and subsidiary companies.
In keeping with the principles of continuous improvement,
the editors’ next task is to respond with the next
issue, as far as possible, to the suggestions for improvements
expressed by Rotor Journal readers, thus offering
them a magazine that comes even closer to meeting
their expectations.